Is Artificial Intelligence Punk?

Photo Credit : Igor Omilaev – Unsplash

AI is no longer just a buzzword—it’s reshaping many creative industries, from marketing to cultural production. But as AI moves from hype to reality, are we making decisions based on long-term value, or are we trapped in inflated expectations?

At the E-AI Conference in Montreal last week, thought leaders explored AI’s evolving role. The takeaway? AI exists in a dual state: a revolution in its potential, but an illusion in its current promises.

AI: The New Punk?

AI is democratizing creative tools, making high-quality production accessible. But creativity isn’t just output—it’s intent, authenticity, and emotion. AI doesn’t create meaning; humans do. If used carelessly, AI risks automating creativity into predictable, engagement-optimized content.

Dennis Kastrup’s talk, “Punk’s Not Dead and No Longer Alive!”, compared AI to punk: anyone can make music now, just as punk once removed barriers to creation. But key questions remain:

• Does ease of access diminish true artistry?
• Is AI a creative revolution or a machine-driven homogenization?
• Will AI-generated creative work be rebellious—or just another mass-market product?

Punk wasn’t polished, but it was powerful. AI can play a similar role—if we use it to amplify human ideas and multiply the mediums with which humans can tell impactful stories.

The AI Hype Cycle: Are We Jumping Too Soon?

As per Gartner’s Hype Cycle report, AI is (mostly) in the phase of inflated expectations. Many businesses are investing heavily before AI has proven its long-term impact—much as with the dot-com boom or early streaming services. The pressure to adopt AI feels urgent, but is it a true business imperative or a race driven by financial interests?

During “Is AI Really the Shit?”, investor Claude G. Théoret highlighted concerns:

• OpenAI is losing $1B/month, with no clear profitability path.
• AI products are sold below cost, fueling an investment bubble.
• Leadership turnover raises questions about stability.

While OpenAI has invested the most, all tech giants plan to invest heavily in 2025: Microsoft with $80B, Google with $75B, and Facebook with $65B, creating significant pressure to recoup any such investments. 

This financial reality begs the question: are we making AI decisions based on real strategic value or reacting to artificial market pressure? Before over-investing, businesses must experiment, refine, and ensure AI serves real needs.

AI Is Biased—And It Shapes Culture

AI is only as good as its training data, which is currently filled with biases and overused content. If we don’t rethink AI training, we risk feeding it more of the same rather than fostering innovation.

• How can we train AI on richer, more diverse datasets?
• How do we prevent AI-generated content from reinforcing biases?

AI is not neutral; it mirrors what we feed it. Algorithms already dictate cultural discoverability, shaping what we see and hear. The gap between diverse content offerings and actual consumption is widening, and AI could deepen this divide.

Beyond automation, AI threatens critical thinking. If we rely too heavily on AI insights, do we risk losing independent thought? Punk was about doing things differently, questioning norms. If AI erodes our ability to think critically, we lose what makes creativity valuable.

The Age of Sameness—Or the Age of Possibility?

We risk entering “The Age of Average”, where AI flattens creativity into formulaic, predictable content. If left unchecked, AI could reduce creative work to what’s most optimized, profitable, and easily replicated—at the expense of originality and nuance.

Brands, agencies, and creatives must actively shape AI’s role rather than passively accept algorithmic dictates. Now is not the time to over-invest in any single tool. It’s time to play, explore, and remain critical—so that when the moment is right, we’re ready.

keep reading